A Reply to Wielenberg on a Timeless First Cause
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward three further criticisms of the view that God is temporal since the moment of creation. It is seen that these criticisms are misconceived and do not take cognizance of what I have written elsewhere.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2021]
|
In: |
TheoLogica
Year: 2021, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-99 |
RelBib Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Singularity
B God and time B Creation B Divine eternity B Timelessness |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward three further criticisms of the view that God is temporal since the moment of creation. It is seen that these criticisms are misconceived and do not take cognizance of what I have written elsewhere. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
Reference: | Kritik von "A Temporal First Cause? (2021)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i1.60693 |