Theology and philosophy within radical orthodoxy (Milbank) and reformational philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
This article aims to show that, despite agreeing on some basic issues such as rejecting the dogma of the autonomy of reason and accepting that there is no territory independent of God, Radical Orthodoxy and Reformational Philosophy nonetheless differ. While both philosophy and theology, according to...
| Publié dans: | Acta theologica |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
2015
|
| Dans: |
Acta theologica
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Église orthodoxe
/ Réforme protestante
/ Philosophie
/ Dogme
/ Raison
/ Dieu
/ Relation
|
| RelBib Classification: | FA Théologie NAB Théologie fondamentale VA Philosophie VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | This article aims to show that, despite agreeing on some basic issues such as rejecting the dogma of the autonomy of reason and accepting that there is no territory independent of God, Radical Orthodoxy and Reformational Philosophy nonetheless differ. While both philosophy and theology, according to Radical Orthodoxy, investigate being qua, being only theology has the task to relate being to God. This view still continues the medieval nature‑grace split. Alternatively, it is argued that the distinctive feature of scholarly endeavours, namely modal abstraction, may enhance an appreciation of the special scientific nature of theology, without advocating a “static division of human life” into “distinct spheres”. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2309-9089 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Acta theologica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4314/actat.v35i1.12 HDL: 10520/EJC172462 |