Is the Human Being Redeemable? A Self-Defeating Question
Abstract Rosenzweig’s pathos with respect to an ultimate redemption raises the question of the desirability of a state in which so much has to be undone in order to retain nothing but the One, the All, the Eternal, and the True. Similar doubts arise concerning Rosenzweig’s portrayal of the ways that...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2021
|
Dans: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Année: 2021, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 92-102 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Rosenzweig, Franz 1886-1929, Der Stern der Erlösung
/ Être humain
/ Rédemption
/ Possibilité
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion BH Judaïsme NBK Sotériologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Finitude
B Messianism B Franz Rosenzweig B Franz Kafka B Walter Benjamin B History B totality |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Abstract Rosenzweig’s pathos with respect to an ultimate redemption raises the question of the desirability of a state in which so much has to be undone in order to retain nothing but the One, the All, the Eternal, and the True. Similar doubts arise concerning Rosenzweig’s portrayal of the ways that this state of redemption is anticipated in life: through prayer, love of neighbor, the communal hymn of the We. How accessible are these to “the human being” as such? Rather than arguing against what appears as a grand remnant of the urge for totality, I invoke here two figures whose concepts of redemption partly resemble Rosenzweig’s, but depart from him in ways that make all the difference: Benjamin and Kafka. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-285X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341319 |