Why Do We Believe Humans Matter More than Other Animals?
Abstract Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals can be strengthened by cognitive dissonance. Jaquet (forthcoming) argues that some of these studies also show that the relevant belief is primarily caused by cognitive dissonance and is ther...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2020
|
In: |
Journal of applied animal ethics research
Year: 2020, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 272-278 |
Further subjects: | B
empirical psychology
B Speciesism B Jaquet F B Racism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1757452931 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210507042653.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210507s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/25889567-BJA10006 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1757452931 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1757452931 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hill, Scott |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Hill, Scott | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Do We Believe Humans Matter More than Other Animals? |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals can be strengthened by cognitive dissonance. Jaquet (forthcoming) argues that some of these studies also show that the relevant belief is primarily caused by cognitive dissonance and is therefore subject to a debunking argument. We offer an alternative hypothesis according to which we are already speciesist but cognitive dissonance merely enhances our speciesism. We argue that our hypothesis explains the results of the studies at least as well as Jaquet’s. We then respond to a series of objections. Along the way, we highlight various respects in which further studies are needed to decide between Jaquet’s hypothesis and ours. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Speciesism | |
650 | 4 | |a Racism | |
650 | 4 | |a empirical psychology | |
650 | 4 | |a Jaquet F | |
700 | 1 | |a Bertrand, Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of applied animal ethics research |d Leiden : Brill, 2019 |g 2(2020), 2, Seite 272-278 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)168461418X |w (DE-600)3002529-1 |x 2588-9567 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:272-278 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-BJA10006 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jaae/2/2/article-p272_9.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3924743142 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1757452931 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220701120405 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210507||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-05-06#035D239370B46E6A43B51C1A14A5A1D9694678D3 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |