Understanding Moral Disagreement: A Christian Perspectivalist Approach

Deep moral disagreements exist between Christians and non-Christians. I argue that Christians should resist the temptation to pin all such disagreements on the irrationality of their disputants. To this end, I develop an epistemological framework on which both parties can be rational—the key being t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mcallister, Blake (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2021
In: Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 5
Further subjects:B Phenomenal Conservatism
B moral perspectivalism
B peer disagreement
B Moral Disagreement
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1760775126
003 DE-627
005 20210622130630.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210617s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel12050318  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1760775126 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1760775126 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1201846102  |0 (DE-627)1686086059  |4 aut  |a Mcallister, Blake 
109 |a Mcallister, Blake 
245 1 0 |a Understanding Moral Disagreement  |b A Christian Perspectivalist Approach 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Deep moral disagreements exist between Christians and non-Christians. I argue that Christians should resist the temptation to pin all such disagreements on the irrationality of their disputants. To this end, I develop an epistemological framework on which both parties can be rational—the key being that their beliefs are formed from different perspectives and, hence, on the basis of different sets of evidence. I then alleviate concerns that such moral perspectivalism leads to relativism or skepticism, or that it prohibits rational discourse. I end by exploring new avenues for resolving deep moral disagreements opened up by the perspectivalist approach. 
650 4 |a Moral Disagreement 
650 4 |a moral perspectivalism 
650 4 |a peer disagreement 
650 4 |a Phenomenal Conservatism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 12(2021), 5, Artikel-ID 318  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2021  |g number:5  |g elocationid:318 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/5/318/pdf?version=1620277819  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12050318  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/5/318  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 393911815X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1760775126 
LOK |0 005 20210617161043 
LOK |0 008 210617||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL