Dydym Ślepy – mistrz szkoły aleksandryjskiej (przegląd źródeł) = Didymus the Blind - the Master of the Alexandrian School (Source Review) 

The aim of this article is to present a review of the late antique sources showing that Didymus the Blind was a master of the Christian Alexandrian school and to examine them in the context of research on the phenomenon of this school. The author analyses three basic sources with information on the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Studia religiologica
Autres titres:Didymus the Blind - the Master of the Alexandrian School (Source Review) 
Auteur principal: Szymańska-Kuta, Daria (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Polonais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wydawn. Uniw. Jagiellońskiego 2010
Dans: Studia religiologica
Année: 2010, Volume: 43, Pages: 77-92
Sujets non-standardisés:B badania porównawcze religii
B historia religii
B filozofia religiistudia religiologica
B psychologia religii
B Religia
B antropologia religii
B socjologii religii
B Religijność
B wuj
B wydawnictwo uj
B religioznawstwo
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The aim of this article is to present a review of the late antique sources showing that Didymus the Blind was a master of the Christian Alexandrian school and to examine them in the context of research on the phenomenon of this school. The author analyses three basic sources with information on the place and role of Didymus in the Alexandrian didaskaleion, i.e. Historia Ecclesiastica by Rufinus of Aquileia (XI 7), Historia Ecclesiastica by Sozomen (III 15), and Christianike Historia by Philip of Side. The author polemicises with the interpretation of the key source of Rufinus of Aquileia proposed by R. Layton, with which she contrasts her own interpretation founded on the research current of the socalled Alexandrian school. Referring to the history of research on the Alexandrian didaskaleion, the author considers whether and to what extent the designation of Didymus as scholae ecclesiasticae doctor (contained in the writings of Rufinus of Aquileia) might refer to the fact that Didymus operated his own, comparatively independent exegetical school, which as a result of the character of Didymus’ ideas could only be perceived as a continuation of the Alexandrian school led earlier by Clement and Origen.
ISSN:2084-4077
Contient:Enthalten in: Studia religiologica