Response to Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)
This is a response given at the book launch for Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), hosted jointly, in November 2020, by the Centre for Catholic Studies, Durham University, and the Australian Catholic University. The...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2021
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 293-297 |
Review of: | Kant and the Divine (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Adams, Nicholas)
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Book review B Divine B Reception B Christianity B Divinity B Kant |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This is a response given at the book launch for Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), hosted jointly, in November 2020, by the Centre for Catholic Studies, Durham University, and the Australian Catholic University. The response considers the gap between the textual Kant (as set out by Insole), and the received Kant, and reflects on how theologians have been too quick either to condemn and dismiss (a poorly interpreted) Kant, or to rehabilitate Kant for theological projects, which Kant would have been opposed to, given his deepest philosophical commitments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Author’s Reflections on the Responses and Questions from the Book Launch (2021)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/09539468211009762 |