Is Aristotelian-Thomistic Natural Philosophy Still Relevant to Cosmology?
Do advances in the natural sciences leave the followers of Aristotle and Aquinas without a cosmos? Is their natural philosophy irrelevant to modern cosmology and its Big Bang theory? The following essay answers these questions and argues that natural philosophy is perennially relevant to cosmology....
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
2019
|
| Dans: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Année: 2019, Volume: 93, Pages: 151-176 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1764791789 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220203162016.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210728s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc2021423114 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1764791789 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1764791789 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brungardt, John G. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Aristotelian-Thomistic Natural Philosophy Still Relevant to Cosmology? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Do advances in the natural sciences leave the followers of Aristotle and Aquinas without a cosmos? Is their natural philosophy irrelevant to modern cosmology and its Big Bang theory? The following essay answers these questions and argues that natural philosophy is perennially relevant to cosmology. It defends the idea that Aristotelian-Thomistic natural philosophy reaches a true, general definition of the universe: the unity of order of all mobile beings according to place, duration, and agent causality. The essay defends this conclusion while answering three opposing views, those of Jonathan Schaffer, Peter Simons, and Immanuel Kant. The true account is attained through reasoning about the nature of place, duration, and agent causality. Objections against these lines of argument are answered to clarify their continued relevance. Since it provides even our modern scientific cosmology with the necessarily assumed notion of the universe, Aristotelian-Thomistic natural philosophy is perennially relevant to cosmology. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 652 | |a VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC, 1926 |g 93(2019), Seite 151-176 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:93 |g year:2019 |g pages:151-176 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2021423114 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpaproc&id=acpaproc_2019_0093_0151_0176 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 93 |j 2019 |h 151-176 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3958345506 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1764791789 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220203162016 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210728||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||