Divine Esse Without Ontological Significance: Jean-Luc Marion’s Challenge to Aquinas
In God Without Being, Jean-Luc Marion infamously argues that Thomas Aquinas is the progenitor of modern onto-theology and thus conceptual idolatry. Yet in 1995, Marion published an intensive study of Aquinas arguing he cannot be called an onto-theologian. Nevertheless, he reiterates a suspicion abou...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2019
|
In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2019, Volume: 93, Pages: 293-309 |
RelBib Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God TG High Middle Ages TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 176479186X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220203162715.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210728s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc2021423115 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)176479186X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP176479186X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cockerell, Jameson |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Divine Esse Without Ontological Significance |b Jean-Luc Marion’s Challenge to Aquinas |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In God Without Being, Jean-Luc Marion infamously argues that Thomas Aquinas is the progenitor of modern onto-theology and thus conceptual idolatry. Yet in 1995, Marion published an intensive study of Aquinas arguing he cannot be called an onto-theologian. Nevertheless, he reiterates a suspicion about the identification of God and Esse—in particular, how it has been understood by those following Aquinas. He ends with a challenge for Thomism as a living tradition: Divine Esse will not be onto-theological to the extent that it avoids ontological significance. We will argue that Aquinas would reject the exigency of speaking Divine Esse without ontological significance precisely because it is through it that he articulates God’s transcendence and incomprehensibility. Despite this opposition, there is a surprising and deeper complementarity to be seen: ontological significance for Aquinas carries its own veil of darkness which makes it more amenable to Marion’s demand than might be suspected. | ||
601 | |a Ontologie | ||
601 | |a Marion, Jean-Luc | ||
601 | |a Challenger | ||
652 | |a NBC:TG:TK:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1926 |g 93(2019), Seite 293-309 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:93 |g year:2019 |g pages:293-309 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2021423115 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpaproc&id=acpaproc_2019_0093_0293_0309 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3958345603 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 176479186X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220203162715 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210728||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053690 |a TG | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |