Euthanasia and Disability: Comments on “What Should We Do for Jay?”

In his paper, Turnbull raises an important but often unrecognized point, which is that there are certain limitations to what rights can do for us. He introduces the notions of „trust“ and „compassion“ in order to indicate the kind of limitation he has in mind. While I am sympathetic to his general p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reinders, Hans S. 1950- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2005
In: Journal of religion, disability & health
Year: 2005, Volume: 9, Issue: 2, Pages: 37-48
Further subjects:B Ethics
B end of life
B Physician Assisted Suicide
B Rights
B Intellectual disability
B death with dignity
B Family
B Euthanasia
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1765255325
003 DE-627
005 20210802154127.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210802s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1300/J095v09n02_04  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1765255325 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1765255325 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1022659308  |0 (DE-627)717024008  |0 (DE-576)182670775  |4 aut  |a Reinders, Hans S.  |d 1950- 
109 |a Reinders, Hans S. 1950-  |a Reinders, Johannes Sjoerd 1950-  |a Reinders, J. S. 1950-  |a Reinders, Hans 1950- 
245 1 0 |a Euthanasia and Disability  |b Comments on “What Should We Do for Jay?” 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his paper, Turnbull raises an important but often unrecognized point, which is that there are certain limitations to what rights can do for us. He introduces the notions of „trust“ and „compassion“ in order to indicate the kind of limitation he has in mind. While I am sympathetic to his general position at this pointthere are certain concerns in the ethical domain that cannot be properly addressed by the notion of rights-I think the author owes his readers a more explicit explanantion about what it is that rights cannot do in the particular case he presents us with. Thinking about this case, Turnbull finds himself trapped in a paradox, which leads him to believe he must move beyond rights claims. The paraadox, as he describes it, is that if we stick to rights claims in order to protect people with disabilities against various kinds of discrimination in the context of health care, they might end up in a situation where neither they nor we want them to be. 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a death with dignity 
650 4 |a end of life 
650 4 |a Euthanasia 
650 4 |a Family 
650 4 |a Intellectual disability 
650 4 |a Physician Assisted Suicide 
650 4 |a Rights 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion, disability & health  |d [S.l.] : Routledge, 1999  |g 9(2005), 2, Seite 37-48  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)366026801  |w (DE-600)2112749-9  |w (DE-576)105935026  |x 1522-9122  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2005  |g number:2  |g pages:37-48 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1300/J095v09n02_04  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 9  |j 2005  |e 2  |h 37-48 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3959195443 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1765255325 
LOK |0 005 20210802152934 
LOK |0 008 210802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL