A Response to Chapters Seven and Eight: Retarded Children or Retarded Ethics?
Newell responds to the essays presented in chapters seven and eight. The way in which disability removes dignity and claims to personhood in accounts of contemporary ethics is explored in contemplating Hauerwas' perceptive work, suggesting he led the way in understanding this phenomenon. Yet, f...
| Publié dans: | Journal of religion, disability & health |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2005
|
| Dans: |
Journal of religion, disability & health
Année: 2005, Volume: 8, Numéro: 3/4, Pages: 141-147 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Disability
B Theology B Ethics B Humanness B Utilitarianism B Children |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Newell responds to the essays presented in chapters seven and eight. The way in which disability removes dignity and claims to personhood in accounts of contemporary ethics is explored in contemplating Hauerwas' perceptive work, suggesting he led the way in understanding this phenomenon. Yet, for all the value of his insights, it is suggested we need an account of medical ethics, and bioethics in general, which moves beyond talking about disability to being informed by, and commencing with, the narratives of people with disability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1522-9122 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion, disability & health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1300/J095v08n03_17 |