Spookiness, Sea Sponges, Stardust, and the Sacred: The Ethics of Quanto-Bio-Cosmic Ontological Interdependence
Developments in twentieth-century science upended the classical Newtonian paradigm that posited a mechanistic universe of atomized entities, regular forces, and natural laws. Trajectories in quantum, biological and cosmic sciences began to indicate instead a paradigm of entanglement and relativity....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2021
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 382-411 |
Further subjects: | B
Cosmology
B Ecology B Interdependence B quantum physics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1767697287 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210824151809.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210824s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12356 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1767697287 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1767697287 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1239697597 |0 (DE-627)1767747926 |4 aut |a Porter, Andrew Stone | |
109 | |a Porter, Andrew Stone |a Stone Porter, Andrew | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Spookiness, Sea Sponges, Stardust, and the Sacred |b The Ethics of Quanto-Bio-Cosmic Ontological Interdependence |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Developments in twentieth-century science upended the classical Newtonian paradigm that posited a mechanistic universe of atomized entities, regular forces, and natural laws. Trajectories in quantum, biological and cosmic sciences began to indicate instead a paradigm of entanglement and relativity. Religious ethicists and theologians, especially feminists, have interpreted the new model by adopting “interdependence” as a relational-ontological symbol. What are the implications of this move for religious ethics? I consider a selection of representative works that ascribe normative value to quanto-bio-cosmic ontological interdependence. The contemporary scientific paradigm affirms feminist and liberationist relational ontologies, but the attempt to synthesize an “ethico-onto-epistemology” from natural processes inevitably runs up against the fact/value distinction as well as ethical ambiguities intrinsic to natural interdependence. These issues must be addressed if interdependence is to survive as a theological ethical symbol. | ||
601 | |a Ontologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ecology | |
650 | 4 | |a Cosmology | |
650 | 4 | |a quantum physics | |
650 | 4 | |a Interdependence | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 49(2021), 2, Seite 382-411 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:382-411 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12356 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12356 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3970870739 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1767697287 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210824042632 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-23#66E95D4F67700ADD00768CD7758145D94F51B77D | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |