Spookiness, Sea Sponges, Stardust, and the Sacred: The Ethics of Quanto-Bio-Cosmic Ontological Interdependence

Developments in twentieth-century science upended the classical Newtonian paradigm that posited a mechanistic universe of atomized entities, regular forces, and natural laws. Trajectories in quantum, biological and cosmic sciences began to indicate instead a paradigm of entanglement and relativity....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Porter, Andrew Stone (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 382-411
Further subjects:B Cosmology
B Ecology
B Interdependence
B quantum physics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1767697287
003 DE-627
005 20210824151809.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210824s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12356  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767697287 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767697287 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1239697597  |0 (DE-627)1767747926  |4 aut  |a Porter, Andrew Stone 
109 |a Porter, Andrew Stone  |a Stone Porter, Andrew 
245 1 0 |a Spookiness, Sea Sponges, Stardust, and the Sacred  |b The Ethics of Quanto-Bio-Cosmic Ontological Interdependence 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Developments in twentieth-century science upended the classical Newtonian paradigm that posited a mechanistic universe of atomized entities, regular forces, and natural laws. Trajectories in quantum, biological and cosmic sciences began to indicate instead a paradigm of entanglement and relativity. Religious ethicists and theologians, especially feminists, have interpreted the new model by adopting “interdependence” as a relational-ontological symbol. What are the implications of this move for religious ethics? I consider a selection of representative works that ascribe normative value to quanto-bio-cosmic ontological interdependence. The contemporary scientific paradigm affirms feminist and liberationist relational ontologies, but the attempt to synthesize an “ethico-onto-epistemology” from natural processes inevitably runs up against the fact/value distinction as well as ethical ambiguities intrinsic to natural interdependence. These issues must be addressed if interdependence is to survive as a theological ethical symbol. 
601 |a Ontologie 
650 4 |a Ecology 
650 4 |a Cosmology 
650 4 |a quantum physics 
650 4 |a Interdependence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 49(2021), 2, Seite 382-411  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:382-411 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12356  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12356  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3970870739 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767697287 
LOK |0 005 20210824042632 
LOK |0 008 210824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-23#66E95D4F67700ADD00768CD7758145D94F51B77D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL