Are Reduplicative Qua-Operators Superfluous?

Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purp...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal for philosophy of religion
Subtitles:"Special Issue - Ritual, Confucianism and Asian Philosophy of Religion"
Main Author: Yang, Eric ca. 21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham 2021
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religious philosophy / God / Operator / Human being
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Incarnation
B Christology
B reduplication
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (doi)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purport to avoid contradiction, one that offers a novel analysis of negative predications and the other which prevents conjoining divine and human predicates into a meaningful sentence. In this paper, I argue that these newer approaches either fail to provide a distinctive solution or do not show whether the model is genuinely possible.
Contains:Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3079