Are Reduplicative Qua-Operators Superfluous?
Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purp...
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
---|---|
Nebentitel: | "Special Issue - Ritual, Confucianism and Asian Philosophy of Religion" |
1. VerfasserIn: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2021
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Religionsphilosophie
/ Gott
/ Operator
/ Mensch
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre VA Philosophie |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Incarnation
B Christology B reduplication |
Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (doi) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purport to avoid contradiction, one that offers a novel analysis of negative predications and the other which prevents conjoining divine and human predicates into a meaningful sentence. In this paper, I argue that these newer approaches either fail to provide a distinctive solution or do not show whether the model is genuinely possible. |
---|---|
Enthält: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3079 |