Are Reduplicative Qua-Operators Superfluous?
Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purp...
Autres titres: | "Special Issue - Ritual, Confucianism and Asian Philosophy of Religion" |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2021
|
Dans: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2021, Volume: 13, Numéro: 2, Pages: 145-162 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Philosophie des religions
/ Dieu
/ Operator
/ Être humain
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Incarnation
B Christology B reduplication |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (doi) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Reduplicative approaches to the incarnation attempt to avoid the charge of incoherence by employing a qua-operator that operates on an entire assertion. The main objection to this approach is that it still yields a contradiction. Recently, two new reduplicative approaches have been offered that purport to avoid contradiction, one that offers a novel analysis of negative predications and the other which prevents conjoining divine and human predicates into a meaningful sentence. In this paper, I argue that these newer approaches either fail to provide a distinctive solution or do not show whether the model is genuinely possible. |
---|---|
Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3079 |