Moral Appraisal for Everyone: Neurodiversity, Epistemic Limitations, and Responding to the Right Reasons

De Re Significance accounts of moral appraisal consider an agent’s responsiveness to a particular kind of reason, normative moral reasons de re, to be of central significance for moral appraisal. Here, I argue that such accounts find it difficult to accommodate some neuroatypical agents. I offer an...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Field, Claire (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2021
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 733-752
RelBib Classification:NCA Ethics
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
ZD Psychology
Further subjects:B Blameworthiness
B Neuroatypicality
B Moral Appraisal
B Reasons
B Moral ignorance
B Excuse
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1772547085
003 DE-627
005 20250320154201.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211006s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-021-10212-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1772547085 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1772547085 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Field, Claire  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-0810-0685  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Moral Appraisal for Everyone  |b Neurodiversity, Epistemic Limitations, and Responding to the Right Reasons 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a De Re Significance accounts of moral appraisal consider an agent’s responsiveness to a particular kind of reason, normative moral reasons de re, to be of central significance for moral appraisal. Here, I argue that such accounts find it difficult to accommodate some neuroatypical agents. I offer an alternative account of how an agent’s responsiveness to normative moral reasons affects moral appraisal - the Reasonable Expectations Account. According to this account, what is significant for appraisal is not the content of the reasons an agent is responsive to (de re or de dicto), but rather whether she is responsive to the reasons it is reasonable to expect her to be responsive to, irrespective of their content. I argue that this account does a better job of dealing with neuroatypical agents, while agreeing with the De Re Significance accounts on more ordinary cases. 
601 |a Episteme 
650 4 |a Blameworthiness 
650 4 |a Excuse 
650 4 |a Moral Appraisal 
650 4 |a Moral ignorance 
650 4 |a Neuroatypicality 
650 4 |a Reasons 
652 |a NCA:VB:ZD 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 24(2021), 3, Seite 733-752  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:733-752 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-021-10212-5.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10212-5  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3984768982 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1772547085 
LOK |0 005 20250320154201 
LOK |0 008 211006||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053747  |a ZD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 939   |a 06-10-21  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL