Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: Exploring a Glut-Theoretic Account
This essay marks the first steps towards a viable glut-theoretic (contradictory) solution to the longstanding foreknowledge and free will dilemma. Specifically, I offer a solution to the dilemma that accommodates omniscience (foreknowledge) and human freedom (as the ability to do otherwise) in a sim...
| Published in: | Religions |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
2021
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 9 |
| Further subjects: | B
contradictory theology
B Free Will B gluts B subclassical logic B Foreknowledge |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1772594032 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211006174344.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211006s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel12090770 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1772594032 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1772594032 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a DeVito, Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom |b Exploring a Glut-Theoretic Account |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay marks the first steps towards a viable glut-theoretic (contradictory) solution to the longstanding foreknowledge and free will dilemma. Specifically, I offer a solution to the dilemma that accommodates omniscience (foreknowledge) and human freedom (as the ability to do otherwise) in a simple, flat-footed way. This goal is accomplished via viewing the theological fatalist argument not as a problem, but as a sound argument: omniscience and human free will are contradictory and by dropping to a weaker underlying account of logical consequence, we can embrace them in their full-throated, robust (though contradictory) interpretations. That said, the primary aim of this paper is one of exploration: how does a subclassical solution to the foreknowledge and free will dilemma stack up in comparison to the traditional solutions on offer in the literature. This essay represents the beginning of such an exploration. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a contradictory theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Foreknowledge | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gluts | |
| 650 | 4 | |a subclassical logic | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 12(2021), 9, Artikel-ID 770 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2021 |g number:9 |g elocationid:770 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/770/pdf?version=1631695135 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090770 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/770 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 2021 |e 9 |i 770 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3984967853 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1772594032 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211006173134 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211006||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||