Naming Vulnerability: A Diaconal Dilemma of Designation
Naming is a way of exercising power. The practice of designation in diaconia causes dilemmas. As a contribution to the self-critical examination of language use in diaconal studies and work, this article discusses the ever more common practice of designating some particular groups as “(the) vulnerab...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
2020
|
| In: |
Diaconia
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 125-140 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCC Social ethics RK Charity work VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 177333056X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220120155215.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211012s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.13109/diac.2020.11.2.125 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)177333056X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP177333056X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)124688438 |0 (DE-627)363668357 |0 (DE-576)186619561 |4 aut |a Stålsett, Sturla J. |d 1964- | |
| 109 | |a Stålsett, Sturla J. 1964- |a Stålsett, Sturla Johan 1964- |a Staalsett, Sturla J. 1964- |a Stalsett, Sturla J. 1964- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Naming Vulnerability |b A Diaconal Dilemma of Designation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Naming is a way of exercising power. The practice of designation in diaconia causes dilemmas. As a contribution to the self-critical examination of language use in diaconal studies and work, this article discusses the ever more common practice of designating some particular groups as “(the) vulnerable.” Such a designation may appeal to ethical and diaconal action, but it may also contribute to stigmatization and paternalism - and undermine the potential of solidarity and resistance inherent in focusing on the common condition of vulnerability. In its discussion of this dilemma, the article argues that diaconal practice should make shared vulnerability its normative basis and accordingly avoid the general designation of “(the) vulnerable groups.” Rather, it should apply alternative linguistic strategies. | ||
| 601 | |a Dilemma | ||
| 652 | |a NCC:RK:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Diaconia |d Göttingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010 |g 11(2020), 2, Seite 125-140 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)636202674 |w (DE-600)2575696-5 |w (DE-576)36002842X |x 2196-9027 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:125-140 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.13109/diac.2020.11.2.125 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.vr-elibrary.de/doi/10.13109/diac.2020.11.2.125 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3988341819 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 177333056X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220224100345 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211012||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053275 |a RK | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||