Revisiting Anselm on Time and Divine Eternity

How to understand Saint Anselm of Canterbury on time and divine eternity is subject to debate. Katherin Rogers argues that Anselm is a four-dimensionalist, whereas Brian Leftow argues that he is a presentist. Despite the disagreement, both scholars assume that Anselm has a positive account of time a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bobier, Christopher A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2021, Volume: 62, Issue: 4, Pages: 665-679
RelBib Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1774389363
003 DE-627
005 20220419211553.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211018s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/heyj.13593  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1774389363 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1774389363 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bobier, Christopher A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting Anselm on Time and Divine Eternity 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a How to understand Saint Anselm of Canterbury on time and divine eternity is subject to debate. Katherin Rogers argues that Anselm is a four-dimensionalist, whereas Brian Leftow argues that he is a presentist. Despite the disagreement, both scholars assume that Anselm has a positive account of time and divine eternity to offer. I challenge this assumption, arguing that Anselm is not interested in offering an account of the metaphysics of time and divine eternity. The reading defended here is deflationary in the following sense: Anselm is trying to purify, so to speak, the notion of ‘divine eternity’ from creaturely imperfections that are suggested by our language. 
652 |a KAE:NBC:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 62(2021), 4, Seite 665-679  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:665-679 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13593  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.13593  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3991090600 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1774389363 
LOK |0 005 20220419211553 
LOK |0 008 211018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044462  |a KAE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL