The Postmetaphysics of Religious Difference

This article contests the dominant paradigm in the theology of religions which promotes a type of pluralism purporting to recognise a limited form of “otherness” and “difference” but which emerges upon analysis to obviate these by incorporating religions into a single theological or philosophical sc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bendle, Mervyn Frederick (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publ. 1998
In: Pacifica
Year: 1998, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-26
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1775188078
003 DE-627
005 20211026043015.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211026s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1030570X9801100101  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1775188078 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1775188078 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bendle, Mervyn Frederick  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Postmetaphysics of Religious Difference 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article contests the dominant paradigm in the theology of religions which promotes a type of pluralism purporting to recognise a limited form of “otherness” and “difference” but which emerges upon analysis to obviate these by incorporating religions into a single theological or philosophical schema, reducing their concrete plurality and particularity to an abstract unity based on ontotheological presuppositions. It therefore proposes a perspective that draws upon contemporary postmetaphysical thought, particularly the work of Rosenzweig and Levinas. It suggests that the appropriate posture in the face of religious difference is one that valorises otherness and nurtures and sustains religious difference. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Pacifica  |d London : Sage Publ., 1988  |g 11(1998), 1, Seite 1-26  |w (DE-627)618793011  |w (DE-600)2538368-1  |w (DE-576)32599787X  |x 1839-2598  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:1998  |g number:1  |g pages:1-26 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1643062018  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1030570X9801100101  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3996026137 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1775188078 
LOK |0 005 20211026043015 
LOK |0 008 211026||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-14#59C3874D9C948845E6C83807BCE67510F5D02080 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL