Autonomia o risonanza?: La teoria critica di Hartmut Rosa tra pluralismo diagnostico e monismo normativo
Hartmut Rosa’s work is one of the most significant attempts to establish on a new basis a general critical theory of society capable of offering new plausible views on the crises which affect current times and enabling the prospect of a cultural and political alternative. Rosa is outstanding, moreov...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2017
|
| In: |
Annali di studi religiosi
Year: 2017, Volume: 18, Pages: 53-64 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1775682439 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211028170213.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211028s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.14598/ANNALI_STUDI_RELIG_18201705 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1775682439 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1775682439 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ita | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fazio, Giorgio |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Autonomia o risonanza? |b La teoria critica di Hartmut Rosa tra pluralismo diagnostico e monismo normativo |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Hartmut Rosa’s work is one of the most significant attempts to establish on a new basis a general critical theory of society capable of offering new plausible views on the crises which affect current times and enabling the prospect of a cultural and political alternative. Rosa is outstanding, moreover, for his capacity to hold together sociology and philosophy in his own research. His way of handling the social critic’s task capitalizes on different outlooks and strategies. Usually, these varied stances interact productively. Sometimes, however, they generate friction and collide. The divergent perspectives become especially problematic when Rosa comes to a conclusion which actually disallows the pluralistic approach that I try to reconstruct in the first part of my paper. This happens, for example, when he claims that the concept of «resonance» may become the unique standard for a monistic restoration of a general critique of society. As a result, however, social critique runs the risk of changing from an internal critique of modernity into a critique of modernity as such. | ||
| 601 | |a Autonomie | ||
| 601 | |a Diagnostik | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annali di studi religiosi |d Trento : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2000 |g 18(2017), Seite 53-64 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)788845594 |w (DE-600)2775225-2 |w (DE-576)408414685 |x 2284-3892 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2017 |g pages:53-64 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14598/ANNALI_STUDI_RELIG_18201705 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3997156956 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1775682439 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211028164706 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211028||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||