Image and Oblivion: Emmanuel Levinas' Phenomenological Iconoclasm

In the article the question of the role of the image is considered in relation to the theme of oblivion. Why this association? Because, from a phenomenological view, as is argued with the thought of Emmanuel Levinas, the image freeze-frames time. Alerity, then, is understood as radical oblivion. Ale...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Welten, Ruud (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2005
In: Literature and theology
Year: 2005, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 60-73
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1780309864
003 DE-627
005 20211204043054.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/litthe/19.1.60  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1780309864 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780309864 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Welten, Ruud  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Image and Oblivion: Emmanuel Levinas' Phenomenological Iconoclasm 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the article the question of the role of the image is considered in relation to the theme of oblivion. Why this association? Because, from a phenomenological view, as is argued with the thought of Emmanuel Levinas, the image freeze-frames time. Alerity, then, is understood as radical oblivion. Alerity cannot be pictured or remembered. In this manner, an interpretation of the biblical prohibition of images is offered through Levinas’ philosophy of time. It is also maintained that Levinas’ iconoclasm must not be understood on the basis of ‘Judaism’, but must be understood entirely in a phenomenological way. Levinas’ view is compared with the thought on time of Edmund Husserl and with the readings of Jean-Louis Chrétien. 
601 |a Emmanuel, S. J. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Literature and theology  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1987  |g 19(2005), 1, Seite 60-73  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)34271855X  |w (DE-600)2073341-0  |w (DE-576)098474626  |x 1477-4623  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:60-73 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644524740  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23926865  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/19.1.60  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/litthe/article/19/1/60/990408  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013820943 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780309864 
LOK |0 005 20211204043054 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#7245615173B3125BFF663A0B4CF11D39406A3586 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23926865 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL