Josephus and Hippolytus on the Pharisees

Josephus's account of the Jewish sects and parties in BJ 2.119—166 is one of the best known sources concerning these groups. A parallel description exists in the writings of Hippolytus, Ref. 9.18, 2b—29, 4. There has been relatively little done in comparing the versions of Josephus and Hippolyt...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baumgarten, Albert I. 1942- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: HUC 1985
In: Hebrew Union College annual
Year: 1984, Volume: 55, Pages: 1-25
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1780875231
003 DE-627
005 20220120081703.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211209s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1780875231 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780875231 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)14046378X  |0 (DE-627)618402306  |0 (DE-576)318206714  |4 aut  |a Baumgarten, Albert I.  |d 1942- 
109 |a Baumgarten, Albert I. 1942-  |a Baumgarṭen, Albert 1942-  |a Baumgarten, A. I. 1942-  |a Baʾumgarṭen, Alberṭ 1942-  |a Baumgarten, Albert Irwin 1942- 
245 1 0 |a Josephus and Hippolytus on the Pharisees 
264 1 |c 1985 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Josephus's account of the Jewish sects and parties in BJ 2.119—166 is one of the best known sources concerning these groups. A parallel description exists in the writings of Hippolytus, Ref. 9.18, 2b—29, 4. There has been relatively little done in comparing the versions of Josephus and Hippolytus, and what has been done has focused on their accounts of the Essenes. This paper concentrates on a comparison of the descriptions of the Pharisees, and places Hippolytus's comments on that group in the context of New Testament and Patristic accounts of the Pharisees. In the process, it will become clear that we must reconsider the status of the material preserved by Hippolytus; our conception of the literary relationship between Josephus and Hippolytus must also be rethought. Rather than supposing a common source (M. Smith, HUCA 29 [1958], pp. 273—313), or Hippolytus as reviser of what he read in Josephus (C. Burchard, JSJ 8 [1977], pp. 1—41), I believe it clear that Hippolytus used a revision of Josephus, one markedly more pro-Pharisaic than Josephus. Further investigation of the two parallel accounts should yield a clearer picture of the tendencies and affiliations of the reviser of Josephus used by Hippolytus. Future work may also shed light on the nature of the Jewish parties and sects themselves. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion  |t Hebrew Union College annual  |d Cincinnati, Ohio : HUC, 1924  |g 55(1984), Seite 1-25  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)39060853X  |w (DE-600)2150715-6  |w (DE-576)314224513  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:1984  |g pages:1-25 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1649962460  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23507608  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 401836475X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780875231 
LOK |0 005 20211209210558 
LOK |0 008 211209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b FTH Z4-278 (Print)  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC02717547 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00965278 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs  |a inzo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL