INQUIRY, CONVERSATION AND THEISTIC BELIEF: WILLIAM JAMES AND RICHARD RORTY GET RELIGION
This essay examines William James' view that pragmatic philosophy allows for theistic belief and compares it to Richard Rorty's argument that theistic belief is fundamentally incompatible with pragmatic philosophy. Theism is permissible for James because it is commensurate with his view of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2009
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2009, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, Pages: 495-507 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781950938 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211231512.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00477.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781950938 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781950938 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1047408619 |0 (DE-627)778809056 |0 (DE-576)401005941 |4 aut |a Nelson, Derek R. | |
| 109 | |a Nelson, Derek R. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a INQUIRY, CONVERSATION AND THEISTIC BELIEF: WILLIAM JAMES AND RICHARD RORTY GET RELIGION |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay examines William James' view that pragmatic philosophy allows for theistic belief and compares it to Richard Rorty's argument that theistic belief is fundamentally incompatible with pragmatic philosophy. Theism is permissible for James because it is commensurate with his view of philosophy as inquiry. Theism is impermissible for Rorty because it incommensurate with his view of philosophy as conversation. James' arguments are shown to be too generic in their conception of the God in whom theistic belief may be placed, and Rorty's arguments against the desirability of theistic belief are shown to run afoul of his own philosophical program. | ||
| 601 | |a Conversano | ||
| 601 | |a Williams, A. N. | ||
| 601 | |a Richard | ||
| 601 | |a Rorty, Richard | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 50(2009), 3, Seite 495-507 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2009 |g number:3 |g pages:495-507 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646913256 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00477.x |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free article)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00477.x |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00477.x |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019083916 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781950938 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211043320 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#EB6DAAA5D7766F92E62B7C75319D30DA4E137F26 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||