A different approach to the narratives about the tear of the boycott document placed inside al-Ka’bah
This article examines the narratives with regard to lifting the boycott decisions imposed upon the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. There are basically two narratives about this event. While the first one relies on more accurate knowledge, the other contains a speculative scenario. However, sinc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
2007
|
In: |
Journal of religious culture
Year: 2007 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This article examines the narratives with regard to lifting the boycott decisions imposed upon the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. There are basically two narratives about this event. While the first one relies on more accurate knowledge, the other contains a speculative scenario. However, since these two narratives were mixed with each other in time, some contradictory information was narrated, especially information based on a speculative scenario became most popular among the people. At the end, it is understood that the document that included the decisions of boycott was not destroyed in a mysterious way, but torn by a group of people. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-5935 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-50281 |