Caring about you: the motivational component of mentalizing, not the mental state attribution component, predicts religious belief in Japan
Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between mentalizing and religious belief. However, mentalizing can be broken down into several components, and there are certain measures that correspond to such components. This study aimed to examine the relationship between mentalizing and relig...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
2021
|
In: |
Religion, brain & behavior
Year: 2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 361-370 |
Further subjects: | B
Reading the Mind in the Eyes
B Empathy Quotient B Mentalizing B Religious Belief B Japanese |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between mentalizing and religious belief. However, mentalizing can be broken down into several components, and there are certain measures that correspond to such components. This study aimed to examine the relationship between mentalizing and religious belief using two representative measures, the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMET). The results of two studies with Japanese samples showed that the EQ predicted increasing religious belief (study 1), as expected. However, the RMET was not a significant predictor of religious belief (studies 1 and 2). These findings suggest that mentalizing’s mental state attribution component (i.e., matching appropriate mental state words to facial expressions in the eye region) is not directly connected to religious belief. However, the motivational component (i.e., caring about what other people think and feel) is essential for believing in supernatural agents. This study’s limitations and directions for future studies are also discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-5981 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2021.1939767 |