On Evidence and Argument in Phenomenological Research

Set against a background of calls for evidence-based practice, this paper explores the role of evidence and argument in phenomenological research. Drawing on Smith’s (1998) analysis of original argument, the author considers how evidence can be discerned, understood, and communicated, and the result...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walsh, Russell (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Rhodes University 2012
In: The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology
Year: 2012, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-7
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1786153890
003 DE-627
005 20230707150250.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220114s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2989/IPJP.2012.12.1.3.1111  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1786153890 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1786153890 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Walsh, Russell  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On Evidence and Argument in Phenomenological Research 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Set against a background of calls for evidence-based practice, this paper explores the role of evidence and argument in phenomenological research. Drawing on Smith’s (1998) analysis of original argument, the author considers how evidence can be discerned, understood, and communicated, and the resulting kinds and contexts of knowledge that may be constituted in the practice of phenomenological research. Linking Churchill’s (2012) discussion of researcher perspectivity with Smith’s analysis of original argument, contrasts are drawn between rhetorical, demonstrative, and dialectical approaches to argument, with proposed parallels to first-person, second-person, and third-person perspectives explored. Implications for argument-based phenomenological research are discussed. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology  |d Grahamstown : Rhodes University, 2001  |g 12(2012), 2, Supplement, Seite 1-7  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)503330728  |w (DE-600)2210800-2  |w (DE-576)281292809  |x 1445-7377  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g supplement:Supplement  |g pages:1-7 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2012.12.1.3.1111  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2012  |e 2  |f Supplement  |h 1-7 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4035980579 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1786153890 
LOK |0 005 20220114163744 
LOK |0 008 220114||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL