(Mis)Appropriations of Gadamer in Qualitative Research: A Husserlian Critique (Part 1)

Within the Husserlian phenomenological philosophical tradition, description and interpretation co-exist. However, teaching the practice of phenomenological psychological research requires careful articulation of the differences between a descriptive and an interpretive relationship to what is provid...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Applebaum, Marc H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Rhodes University 2011
In: The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology
Year: 2011, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-17
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1786278480
003 DE-627
005 20220117161105.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220117s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2989/IPJP.2011.11.1.8.1107  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1786278480 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1786278480 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Applebaum, Marc H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a (Mis)Appropriations of Gadamer in Qualitative Research  |b A Husserlian Critique (Part 1) 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Within the Husserlian phenomenological philosophical tradition, description and interpretation co-exist. However, teaching the practice of phenomenological psychological research requires careful articulation of the differences between a descriptive and an interpretive relationship to what is provided by qualitative data. If as researchers we neglect the epistemological foundations of our work or avoid working through difficult methodological issues, then our work invites dismissal as inadequate science, undermining the effort to strongly establish psychology along qualitative lines. The first article in this two-part discussion provides a Husserlian investigation of the meaning of ‘method’ for psychology as a human science. This investigation is undertaken in the light of some researchers’ appropriations of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics in the service of non-methodical praxes. The second article will address some implications of the attempt to structure qualitative psychological research along ‘Gadamerian’ lines, taking seriously the references to Gadamer’s work made by researchers such as Van Manen and Smith. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology  |d Grahamstown : Rhodes University, 2001  |g 11(2011), 1, Seite 1-17  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)503330728  |w (DE-600)2210800-2  |w (DE-576)281292809  |x 1445-7377  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:1-17 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2011.11.1.8.1107  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4036746561 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1786278480 
LOK |0 005 20220117155246 
LOK |0 008 220117||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL