Art, Argument, and Ambiguity in the Talmud: Conflicting Conceptions of the Evil Impulse in b.Sukkah 51b-52a

This article explores the literary significance of a logically awkward moment at the center of a sugya of dense argumentation (b.Sukkah 51b—52a). Literary analysis and comparison with earlier parallel sources (primarily from the Palestinian Talmud) reveal that the Babylonian Talmud constructs the lo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: HUC 2003
In: Hebrew Union College annual
Year: 2002, Volume: 73, Pages: 97-132
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1786463385
003 DE-627
005 20220120091621.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220119s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1786463385 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1786463385 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)173866549  |0 (DE-627)698768469  |0 (DE-576)134705262  |4 aut  |a Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks  |d 1967- 
109 |a Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks 1967-  |a Shanks Alexander, Elizabeth 1967- 
245 1 0 |a Art, Argument, and Ambiguity in the Talmud  |b Conflicting Conceptions of the Evil Impulse in b.Sukkah 51b-52a 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article explores the literary significance of a logically awkward moment at the center of a sugya of dense argumentation (b.Sukkah 51b—52a). Literary analysis and comparison with earlier parallel sources (primarily from the Palestinian Talmud) reveal that the Babylonian Talmud constructs the logically awkward moment intentionally by amplifying an ambiguity implicit within its sources. The ambiguity at the heart of the sugya concerns the Evil Impulse. Is he figured as a goad to sin or as a goad to righteousness? While the Bavli's sources for this sugya depict the Evil Impulse primarily as a goad to sin, they contain subtle hints of the other possibility. When incorporating these sources into the fabric of its own argumentation, the Bavli preserves the formulation that depicts the Evil Impulse as a goad to sin, but additionally reconfigures the source to allow for the opposite perspective as well. Ambiguity about the nature of the Evil Impulse permeates the latter part of the sugya. Drawing on contemporary literary theories that link ambiguity with literary value, this article suggests that negotiating ambiguity as found in this sugya constitutes one of the great aesthetic pleasures of reading dense argumentation in the Bavli. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion  |t Hebrew Union College annual  |d Cincinnati, Ohio : HUC, 1924  |g 73(2002), Seite 97-132  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)39060853X  |w (DE-600)2150715-6  |w (DE-576)314224513  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:73  |g year:2002  |g pages:97-132 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1650373252  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23509009  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4038129136 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1786463385 
LOK |0 005 20220119110557 
LOK |0 008 220119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b FTH Z4-278 (Print)  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC02717547 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00965278 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs  |a inzo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a CAN  |a BIB  |a REL