A History of the Future

Does history have to be only about the past? "History" refers to both a subject matter and a thought process. That thought process involves raising questions, marshalling evidence, discerning patterns in the evidence, writing narratives, and critiquing the narratives written by others. Wha...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Staley, David J. 1963- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2002
In: History and theory
Year: 2002, Volume: 41, Issue: 4, Pages: 72-89
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1787080544
003 DE-627
005 20220125115737.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220125s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1468-2303.00221  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787080544 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787080544 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1059265222  |0 (DE-627)798213442  |0 (DE-576)187132461  |4 aut  |a Staley, David J.  |d 1963- 
109 |a Staley, David J. 1963- 
245 1 2 |a A History of the Future 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Does history have to be only about the past? "History" refers to both a subject matter and a thought process. That thought process involves raising questions, marshalling evidence, discerning patterns in the evidence, writing narratives, and critiquing the narratives written by others. Whatever subject matter they study, all historians employ the thought process of historical thinking. What if historians were to extend the process of historical thinking into the subject matter domain of the future? Historians would breach one of our profession’s most rigid disciplinary barriers. Very few historians venture predictions about the future, and those who do are viewed with skepticism by the profession at large. On methodological grounds, most historians reject as either impractical, quixotic, hubristic, or dangerous any effort to examine the past as a way to make predictions about the future. However, where at one time thinking about the future did mean making a scientifically-based prediction, futurists today are just as likely to think in terms of scenarios. Where a prediction is a definitive statement about what will be, scenarios are heuristic narratives that explore alternative plausibilities of what might be. Scenario writers, like historians, understand that surprise, contingency, and deviations from the trend line are the rule, not the exception; among scenario writers, context matters. The thought process of the scenario method shares many features with historical thinking. With only minimal intellectual adjustment, then, most professionally trained historians possess the necessary skills to write methodologically rigorous "histories of the future." 
601 |a Historie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t History and theory  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1960  |g 41(2002), 4, Seite 72-89  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271597585  |w (DE-600)1480747-6  |w (DE-576)07870815X  |x 1468-2303  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:2002  |g number:4  |g pages:72-89 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00221  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2303.00221  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4043507216 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787080544 
LOK |0 005 20220125115345 
LOK |0 008 220125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL