Research suggests Australian childless women are at risk of pronatalism-driven social exclusion. This exploratory, mixed methods, cross-sectional study described and explored the social exclusion of Australian childless women aged 25 to 44 years, and asked: what are the nature and extent of social exclusion of childless women; and do the nature and extent of exclusion vary for different types of childless women? A total of 776 childless female Australian residents aged 25 to 44 years completed a self-administered questionnaire. Quantitative data were collected on childlessness types, indicators of exclusion and perceived stigmatisation and exclusion due to being childless. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, One Way ANOVAs and Kruskal Wallis Analysis of Ranks. Qualitative data on childless women’s experiences were inductively thematically analysed. Findings suggest societal-level pronatalism drives exclusion of Australian childless women. While exclusion occurs in all domains of life, childless women experience more exclusion, and perceive more exclusion due to being childless, in the social and civic domains than the service and economic domains. Circumstantially and involuntarily childless women, followed by voluntarily childless women, perceive more exclusion due to being childless than undecided and future childed women. Experiences are influenced by the nature of women’s ‘deviance’ from pronatalism.
Beth Turnbull, Melissa L Graham, Ann R Taket
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cogitatio Press
2016
|
| In: |
Social Inclusion
Year: 2016, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 102-115 |
| Further subjects: | B
Demography
B Fertility B Stigma B Childlessness B Social exclusion B pronatalism B Stereotypes |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1787203204 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220126115153.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220126s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.17645/si.v4i1.489 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1787203204 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1787203204 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Turnbull, Beth |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Research suggests Australian childless women are at risk of pronatalism-driven social exclusion. This exploratory, mixed methods, cross-sectional study described and explored the social exclusion of Australian childless women aged 25 to 44 years, and asked: what are the nature and extent of social exclusion of childless women; and do the nature and extent of exclusion vary for different types of childless women? A total of 776 childless female Australian residents aged 25 to 44 years completed a self-administered questionnaire. Quantitative data were collected on childlessness types, indicators of exclusion and perceived stigmatisation and exclusion due to being childless. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, One Way ANOVAs and Kruskal Wallis Analysis of Ranks. Qualitative data on childless women’s experiences were inductively thematically analysed. Findings suggest societal-level pronatalism drives exclusion of Australian childless women. While exclusion occurs in all domains of life, childless women experience more exclusion, and perceive more exclusion due to being childless, in the social and civic domains than the service and economic domains. Circumstantially and involuntarily childless women, followed by voluntarily childless women, perceive more exclusion due to being childless than undecided and future childed women. Experiences are influenced by the nature of women’s ‘deviance’ from pronatalism. |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Beth Turnbull, Melissa L Graham, Ann R Taket | ||
| 601 | |a Suggestion | ||
| 601 | |a Stigmatisation | ||
| 601 | |a Circumstantia | ||
| 601 | |a Statistik | ||
| 601 | |a Influencer | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Childlessness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Demography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fertility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pronatalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social exclusion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stereotypes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stigma | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Graham, Melissa L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139855165 |0 (DE-627)703487744 |0 (DE-576)313547602 |4 aut |a Taket, Ann R. |d 1954- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Social Inclusion |d Lisbon : Cogitatio Press, 2013 |g 4(2016), 1, Seite 102-115 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)791558738 |w (DE-600)2779362-X |w (DE-576)410285277 |x 2183-2803 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:102-115 |
| 856 | |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/download/489/489 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.489 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/489 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4044776733 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1787203204 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220126114900 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||