Empowering Indigenous Knowledge in Deliberations on Gene Editing in the Wild

Proposals to release genetically engineered organisms in the wild raise complex ethical issues related to their safe and equitable implementation. While there is broad agreement that community and public engagement is vital to decision-making in this context, more discussion is needed about who shou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Taitingfong, Riley (Author) ; Ullah, Anika (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2021
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2021, Volume: 51, Pages: 74-84
Further subjects:B Deliberation
B Genetic Engineering
B Indigenous Peoples
B Bioethics
B democratic deliberation
B gene drive
B Power
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1787217213
003 DE-627
005 20220126142234.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220126s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.1323  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787217213 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787217213 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Taitingfong, Riley  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Empowering Indigenous Knowledge in Deliberations on Gene Editing in the Wild 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Proposals to release genetically engineered organisms in the wild raise complex ethical issues related to their safe and equitable implementation. While there is broad agreement that community and public engagement is vital to decision-making in this context, more discussion is needed about who should be engaged in such activities and in what ways. This article identifies Indigenous peoples as key stakeholders in decisions about gene-editing in the wild and argues that engagement activities need not only include Indigenous peoples but also be designed, conducted, and analyzed in ways that confront longstanding power imbalances that dismiss Indigenous expertise. We offer specific recommendations to guide deliberative activities to not only be inclusive of Indigenous peoples but also to empower their diverse, situated knowledges. We call on those committed to the inclusive design of broad public deliberation to pursue strategies that shift dominant power dynamics to include Indigenous communities in more meaningful ways. 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Indigenous Peoples 
650 4 |a Bioethics 
650 4 |a Deliberation 
650 4 |a democratic deliberation 
650 4 |a gene drive 
650 4 |a Genetic Engineering 
650 4 |a Power 
700 1 |a Ullah, Anika  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 51(2021,S2), S. S74-S84  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2021  |g supplement:S2  |g pages:74-84 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1323  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1323  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4044828962 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787217213 
LOK |0 005 20220126134707 
LOK |0 008 220126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL