Legibility Zones: An Empirically-Informed Framework for Considering Unbelonging and Exclusion in Contemporary English Academia

This article introduces a new, empirically-derived conceptual framework for considering exclusion in English higher education (HE): legibility zones. Drawing on interviews with academic employees in England, it suggests that participants orientate themselves to a powerful imaginary termed the hegemo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Butler, Jessica Wren (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cogitatio Press 2021
In: Social Inclusion
Year: 2021, Volume: 9, Issue: 3, Pages: 16-26
Further subjects:B impostor syndrome
B Higher Education
B academic staff
B Belonging
B diversity and inclusion
B Inequalities
B Academia
B Alienation
B unbelonging
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1789100615
003 DE-627
005 20220209161238.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220209s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.17645/si.v9i3.4074  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789100615 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789100615 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Butler, Jessica Wren  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Legibility Zones  |b An Empirically-Informed Framework for Considering Unbelonging and Exclusion in Contemporary English Academia 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article introduces a new, empirically-derived conceptual framework for considering exclusion in English higher education (HE): legibility zones. Drawing on interviews with academic employees in England, it suggests that participants orientate themselves to a powerful imaginary termed the hegemonic academic. Failing to align with this ideal can engender a sense of dislocation conceptualised as unbelonging. The mechanisms through which hegemonic academic identity is constituted and unbelonging is experienced are mapped onto three domains: the institutional, the ideological, and the embodied. The framework reveals the mutable and intersecting nature of these zones, highlighting the complex dynamics of unbelonging and the attendant challenge presented to inclusion projects when many apparatuses of exclusion are perceived as fundamental to what HE is for, what an academic is, and how academia functions. 
601 |a Academia 
650 4 |a Academia 
650 4 |a academic staff 
650 4 |a Alienation 
650 4 |a Belonging 
650 4 |a diversity and inclusion 
650 4 |a Higher Education 
650 4 |a impostor syndrome 
650 4 |a Inequalities 
650 4 |a unbelonging 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Social Inclusion  |d Lisbon : Cogitatio Press, 2013  |g 9(2021), 3, Seite 16-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)791558738  |w (DE-600)2779362-X  |w (DE-576)410285277  |x 2183-2803  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:16-26 
856 |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/download/4074/4074  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4074  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4074  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4054909671 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789100615 
LOK |0 005 20220209152524 
LOK |0 008 220209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a CV-Mitteilungen