Hegelio smėlio knyga, arba apie pradžią ir jos negalimybę = Hegel’s Book of Sand, Or on the Beginning of the Beginning and Its Impossibility

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]This paper addresses the still-prevailing problem of the beginning in Hegel’s Science of Logic by focusing on the major arguments of Schelling’s critique, which basically laid the foundation for the subsequent reception of Hegel. Accordin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Hegel’s Book of Sand, Or on the Beginning of the Beginning and Its Impossibility
Main Author: Gelžinytė, Brigita (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Lithuanian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla 2015
In: Religija ir kultūra
Year: 2015, Volume: 16/17, Pages: 89-99
Further subjects:B Concept
B sąvoka
B Beginning
B Hegel
B Performativity
B pradžia
B Hegelis
B performatyvumas
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1789567351
003 DE-627
005 20220623171627.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220214s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||lit c
024 7 |a 10.15388/Relig.2015.7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789567351 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789567351 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a lit 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gelžinytė, Brigita  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Hegelio smėlio knyga, arba apie pradžią ir jos negalimybę  |b  = Hegel’s Book of Sand, Or on the Beginning of the Beginning and Its Impossibility 
246 3 1 |a Hegel’s Book of Sand, Or on the Beginning of the Beginning and Its Impossibility 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a [full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]This paper addresses the still-prevailing problem of the beginning in Hegel’s Science of Logic by focusing on the major arguments of Schelling’s critique, which basically laid the foundation for the subsequent reception of Hegel. According to Schelling, Hegel’s concept of the beginning as pure being can only be understood as either a pure tautology or a negative determination, i.e., indicating only the realm of the possible. Contrary to the prevailing strategies, it is argued that the paradox of the beginning, which is present in the Science of Logic, should be maintained instead of resolved. The paper attempts to demonstrate how the dynamic structure of the unity of being and nothing, and the impossibility of (the principle of ) the beginning, appear to be precisely what allow this thinking to proceed and ground the identity of form and content. Thus, by relying on the suggested alternative, which emphasizes the performative aspect of the paradox, the paper seeks to answer Schelling and to bring closer the apparently contradicting positions of both authors. 
650 4 |a Hegel 
650 4 |a Hegelis 
650 4 |a Beginning 
650 4 |a Concept 
650 4 |a Performativity 
650 4 |a performatyvumas 
650 4 |a pradžia 
650 4 |a sąvoka 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religija ir kultūra  |d Vilnius : Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla, 2006  |g 16/17(2015), Seite 89-99  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1745798285  |w (DE-600)3051786-2  |x 1822-4539  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16/17  |g year:2015  |g pages:89-99 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.15388/Relig.2015.7  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.journals.vu.lt/religija-ir-kultura/article/view/12311  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4056554978 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789567351 
LOK |0 005 20220214174606 
LOK |0 008 220214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL