Transjordan in the Bronze and Iron Ages: A Critique of Glueck's Synthesis

On the basis of his regional surveys in Transjordan, Glueck reconstructed a major phase of occupation during the latter part of the EB (his MBI); a gap during most of the MB and LB; a rise in occupation during Iron I-II; and another gap during late Iron II-Persian. He correlated this archaeological...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of ASOR
Main Author: Sauer, James A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The University of Chicago Press 1986
In: Bulletin of ASOR
Year: 1986, Volume: 263, Pages: 1-26
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1789831822
003 DE-627
005 20220217053005.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220217s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1356908  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789831822 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789831822 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sauer, James A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Transjordan in the Bronze and Iron Ages: A Critique of Glueck's Synthesis 
264 1 |c 1986 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a On the basis of his regional surveys in Transjordan, Glueck reconstructed a major phase of occupation during the latter part of the EB (his MBI); a gap during most of the MB and LB; a rise in occupation during Iron I-II; and another gap during late Iron II-Persian. He correlated this archaeological evidence with the biblical sources, and connected the late EB material with Abram/Abraham; the MB-LB gap with a late Conquest; the Iron I-II occupations with the Israelite, Ammonite, Moabite, and Edomite kingdoms; and the late Iron II-Persian gap with the Exile. Today, the EB IV occupation has been substantiated, but its connection with the patriarchal period is in dispute. The MB-LB gap has disappeared in central and northern Transjordan, where major (Canaanite) tell sites are well attested. The Iron I period was correctly identified, and includes both Iron IA (probably related to the early Israelites, Ammonites, Moabites, and Edomites), and Iron IB (probably related to the Philistines). Iron IC is attested in Transjordan, and during Iron II the distinctive Israelite, Ammonite, Moabite, and Edomite painted potteries emerge. The Neo-Babylonian and Persian gap has been shown to be incorrect, especially in central and southern Transjordan, in the regions of Ammon and Edom. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Schools of Oriental Research  |t Bulletin of ASOR  |d Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 263(1986), Seite 1-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)330355570  |w (DE-600)2050180-8  |w (DE-576)251821994  |x 2161-8062  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:263  |g year:1986  |g pages:1-26 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1650023782  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1356908  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1356908  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/1356908  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 263  |j 1986  |h 1-26 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4060858552 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789831822 
LOK |0 005 20220217053005 
LOK |0 008 220217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-02-09#E74ED8D24899A36FFC5185A2399258D6323A23B7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1356908 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL