Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education

The importance of developing students’ argumentation skills is well established across the curriculum: students should grasp how claims are made and supported in different disciplines. One challenge is to follow and thereby agree with or critique the arguments of others, which requires perspective-t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Fancourt, Nigel (Author) ; Guilfoyle, Liam (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2022
In: Journal of Religious Education
Year: 2022, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-23
RelBib Classification:CF Christianity and Science
RF Christian education; catechetics
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1797093835
003 DE-627
005 20240416193240.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220331s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s40839-021-00143-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1797093835 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1797093835 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1070284238  |0 (DE-627)823686221  |0 (DE-576)420760490  |4 aut  |a Fancourt, Nigel 
109 |a Fancourt, Nigel  |a Fancourt, Nigel Peter Mitchell 
245 1 0 |a Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The importance of developing students’ argumentation skills is well established across the curriculum: students should grasp how claims are made and supported in different disciplines. One challenge is to follow and thereby agree with or critique the arguments of others, which requires perspective-taking, in tracing these other reasons and reasoning. This challenge is increased when disciplines construct argumentation and perspective-taking differently. Here, we consider the role of perspective-taking in argumentation within and between science education and pluralistic religious education, where the former aims at the justification of scientific claims and the latter at both an empathetic understanding of different religions and worldviews, and personal reasoning. We interpretively analyze student data to identify salient features of students’ strategies to perspective-taking within argumentation. Data from 324 pupils across nine schools are explored in relation to students’ challenges in perspective-taking, strategies for perspective-taking within argumentation, and the use of perspective-taking to construct personal argumentation. The analysis shows some barriers to perspective-taking within argumentation, the range of students’ perspective-taking strategies within argumentation, and how personal argumentation could hermeneutically build upon perspective-taking strategies. The importance and implications of perspective-taking within argumentation across the curriculum are considered highlighting challenges in the etic/emic shift, both within the individual subject as well as across them, and some reflections on how this provides a fresh pedagogical perspective on the science/religions debate are made. To end, we conclude with the wider challenges for disciplines and perspective-taking across schooling and university. 
601 |a Argumentation 
601 |a Student 
601 |a Strategie 
652 |a CF:RF 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1237667208  |0 (DE-627)1764598245  |4 aut  |a Guilfoyle, Liam 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Religious Education  |d Singapore : Springer, 2014  |g 70(2022), 1, Seite 1-23  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)815914490  |w (DE-600)2806653-4  |w (DE-576)425059901  |x 2199-4625  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:1-23 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40839-021-00143-9.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-021-00143-9  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4107948803 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1797093835 
LOK |0 005 20221028092223 
LOK |0 008 220331||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053151  |a RF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL