Gay Marriage and Religious Freedom: Lessons from Hobbes

Wendling argues against a religious exemption from participating in gay marriages guaranteed by the civil body. To do so, she recalls the history of the social contract tradition in its pre-revolutionary form, and especially in the texts of Thomas Hobbes. Writing against the backdrop of religious ci...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wendling, Amy E. 1976- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Rabbi Myer and Dorothy Kripke Center for the Study of Religion and Society at Creighton University 2017
In: Journal of religion & society. Supplement
Year: 2017, Volume: 14, Pages: 96-104
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1799390055
003 DE-627
005 20220413222736.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220413s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1799390055 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1799390055 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137923252  |0 (DE-627)598155546  |0 (DE-576)305874411  |4 aut  |a Wendling, Amy E.  |d 1976- 
109 |a Wendling, Amy E. 1976- 
245 1 0 |a Gay Marriage and Religious Freedom  |b Lessons from Hobbes 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Wendling argues against a religious exemption from participating in gay marriages guaranteed by the civil body. To do so, she recalls the history of the social contract tradition in its pre-revolutionary form, and especially in the texts of Thomas Hobbes. Writing against the backdrop of religious civil wars, Hobbes argued that in environments of religious pluralism, positive religious freedoms must always be subordinate to negative religious freedoms and to the interests of a peace-seeking state. Without this subordination, positive religious freedoms would not even be possible. Wendling considers the import of this dialectic for the Free-Exercise Clause of the U.S. Constitution, arguing that the clause may be incompatible with this truth of the modern state. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion & society. Supplement  |d [Omaha, Nev.] : Rabbi Myer and Dorothy Kripke Center for the Study of Religion and Society at Creighton University, 2004  |g 14(2017), Seite 96-104  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1013602706  |w (DE-600)2919568-8  |w (DE-576)499260554  |x 1941-8450  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2017  |g pages:96-104 
856 4 0 |u https://dspace2.creighton.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10504/109262/2017-11.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4117090755 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1799390055 
LOK |0 005 20220413035046 
LOK |0 008 220413||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)1013602706_14_2017_96 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a imwa  |a ixzs  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL