Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz
In this paper, I examine the logical structure of teleological argument and D. Hume's critiques about it, then evaluate the arguments power and significance. Hume's critiques can be summed up in two main points. 1. About the premise of the argument: The concept of "theological order&q...
| Subtitles: | An Analysis on Teleological Argument for the Existence of God |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Turkish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2002
|
| In: |
Dinî araştırmalar
Year: 2002, Volume: 4, Issue: 12, Pages: 31-47 |
| Further subjects: | B
Design
B Order B David Hume B Argument B Richard Swinburne B God B Teleology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1800226381 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220425160602.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220425s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||tur c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1800226381 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1800226381 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a tur | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Uslu, Ferit |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| 246 | 1 | |i Übersetzung des Haupttitels |a An Analysis on Teleological Argument for the Existence of God | |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I examine the logical structure of teleological argument and D. Hume's critiques about it, then evaluate the arguments power and significance. Hume's critiques can be summed up in two main points. 1. About the premise of the argument: The concept of "theological order" is based on an anthropomorphic analogy and this is inappropriate. 2. About the conclusion of the argument: TheArgument doesn't lead us to the God of theistic religions. In the paper, different concepts of order are analyzed and according to this analysis Hume's critiques are discussed widely in the light of R. Swinburne's new formulation of the argument. At the end, in the light of those discussions, I investigate power and significance of the argument | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a David Hume | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Order | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Richard Swinburne | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Teleology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Dinî araştırmalar |d Ankara : DergiPark Akademik, 1998 |g 4(2002), 12, Seite 31-47 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1011059231 |w (DE-600)2916936-7 |w (DE-576)497270226 |x 2602-2435 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2002 |g number:12 |g pages:31-47 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/da/issue/4449/61283 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4120722562 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1800226381 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220425155319 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Design |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Design,Dessein,Dessein |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Design,Deseño,Deseño |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomento,Design |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 設計,逻辑论证 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Design,Desenho,Desenho |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргумент,Дизайн |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Σχεδιασμός,Ντιζάιν,Επιχείρημα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Formgebung,Eingetragenes Design |
