Some Vision Impairments in the Cognitive Science of Religion
In this review, we discuss three vision impairments in the cognitive science of religious beliefs. We first assess the CSR’s improvements upon previous generations’ "mindblindness." We also address "contextblindness," the CSR’s relative lack of focus on the extant environment’s r...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2022
|
In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 167-177 |
Review of: | An introduction to the cognitive science of religion (London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021) (Purzycki, Benjamin Grant)
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Environmental factor
/ Resources
/ Religious conviction
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Anthropology of religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AE Psychology of religion |
Further subjects: | B
behavioral ecology of religion
B Book review B Anthropology B cognitive science of religion |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | In this review, we discuss three vision impairments in the cognitive science of religious beliefs. We first assess the CSR’s improvements upon previous generations’ "mindblindness." We also address "contextblindness," the CSR’s relative lack of focus on the extant environment’s role in the formation and retention of religious beliefs. Finally, we address the problem of the CSR’s "ecoblindness," that is, ignoring how beliefs are aligned with the distribution of resources. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Five Issues in the Debate: A Response to Critics (2022)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.20621 |