Qian Mu reads Zhuangzi: Regarding ‘there has not yet begun to be a “there has not yet begun to be nothing”’
To advance our understanding of both the Book of Zhuāngzǐ 莊子 (c. fourth to third century BCE) and Qián Mù 錢穆 (1895–1990)’s Zhuāngzǐ studies 莊學, I aim to squarely face one of the more obscure passages in the former with recourse to an explanation from the latter. The passage in question is that from...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Asian philosophy |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Carfax
2022
|
| In: |
Asian philosophy
Jahr: 2022, Band: 32, Heft: 2, Seiten: 164-171 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Zhuangzi 365 v. Chr.-290 v. Chr.
/ Qian, Mu 1895-1990
/ Interpretation
/ Schöpfungslehre
/ Existenz
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus BM Chinesischer Universismus; Konfuzianismus; Taoismus NBD Schöpfungslehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Zhuangzi
B Zhuangzi studies B 莊子 B 錢穆 B Qian Mu |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | To advance our understanding of both the Book of Zhuāngzǐ 莊子 (c. fourth to third century BCE) and Qián Mù 錢穆 (1895–1990)’s Zhuāngzǐ studies 莊學, I aim to squarely face one of the more obscure passages in the former with recourse to an explanation from the latter. The passage in question is that from the second chapter beginning with the claim ‘there is a beginning’ (有始也者) and culminating with the claim that ‘there has not yet begun to be a “there has not yet begun to be nothing”’ (有未始有夫未始有無也者). I hope to show that Qián offers a compelling and novel interpretation of this difficult passage worthy of our consideration. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-2961 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2022.2044524 |