(Batı Felsefesi Çerçevesinde) Epistemolojik ve Etik Açıdan İnanç

Epistemology and ethics of belief is one of the most important and serious problems in philosophy and philosophy of religion. Is there, for belief, any standard or criteion to be rational and, if any, what are? Is true and valid belief equivalent to rational belief? Is there any rational basis of re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:The Faith: An Epistemological and Ethical Approach
Main Author: Tüzer, Abdullatif (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Turkish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2003
In: Dinî araştırmalar
Year: 2003, Volume: 6, Issue: 16, Pages: 87-110
Further subjects:B Rationalism
B Wittgensteinian Irrationalism
B Epistemology and Ethics of Belief
B Kant’s Moral Teology
B Fideism
B Pascal’s Wager
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1800775679
003 DE-627
005 20220503141514.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220503s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||tur c
035 |a (DE-627)1800775679 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1800775679 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a tur 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tüzer, Abdullatif  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a (Batı Felsefesi Çerçevesinde) Epistemolojik ve Etik Açıdan İnanç 
246 1 |i Übersetzung des Haupttitels  |a The Faith: An Epistemological and Ethical Approach 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Epistemology and ethics of belief is one of the most important and serious problems in philosophy and philosophy of religion. Is there, for belief, any standard or criteion to be rational and, if any, what are? Is true and valid belief equivalent to rational belief? Is there any rational basis of religious belief and especially God-belief? Or are those irrational? What is the nature of relation between belief, knowledge and ethics? Such questions as these quoted above have been vehemently discussed and answered from different philosophical aspects and several point of views. Chief among them rationalism, pragmatism, intuitionism and fideism can be listed as remarkable and noteworthy. In this paper we have considered, of these, only two, namely rationalism and fideism. In particular, the challenging and severe argument of William K. Clifford against belief in anything upon insufficient evidence, who is a strong and radical rationalist, was explained and then we seized on four conter-argument which can be taken out of philosophical writings of some thinkers. Wittgensteinian fideism, Kierkegaard’s irrationalism, Pascal’s argument of wager and moral evidence of Kant are those. And occasionally we criticised all the views and drew some conclusion and finally evaluated them 
650 4 |a Epistemology and Ethics of Belief 
650 4 |a Fideism 
650 4 |a Kant’s Moral Teology 
650 4 |a Pascal’s Wager 
650 4 |a Rationalism 
650 4 |a Wittgensteinian Irrationalism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Dinî araştırmalar  |d Ankara : DergiPark Akademik, 1998  |g 6(2003), 16, Seite 87-110  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1011059231  |w (DE-600)2916936-7  |w (DE-576)497270226  |x 2602-2435  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2003  |g number:16  |g pages:87-110 
856 4 0 |u https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/da/issue/4453/61336  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4128797634 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1800775679 
LOK |0 005 20220503140836 
LOK |0 008 220503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL