Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism on the Moral Permissibility of Palliative Sedation: A Blurred Demarcation Line
Although Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism agree on the moral justification for palliative sedation, they differ on the premises underlying the justification. While Catholicism justifies palliative sedation on the ground of the Principle of Double Effect, Buddhism does so on the basis of the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
2022
|
In: |
Journal of religion and health
Year: 2022, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 1405-1417 |
Further subjects: | B
Catholic bioethics
B Principle of double effect B Ahiṃsā B Palliative sedation B Buddhist bioethics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1801304742 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220510150301.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220510s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10943-021-01464-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1801304742 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1801304742 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Islam, Asmat Ara |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism on the Moral Permissibility of Palliative Sedation: A Blurred Demarcation Line |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Although Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism agree on the moral justification for palliative sedation, they differ on the premises underlying the justification. While Catholicism justifies palliative sedation on the ground of the Principle of Double Effect, Buddhism does so on the basis of the Third Noble Truth. Despite their theological differences, Buddhism and Catholicism both value the moral significance of the physician’s intent to reduce suffering and both respect the sanctity of life. This blurs the demarcation line between Buddhism and Catholicism regarding the moral justification of palliative sedation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ahiṃsā | |
650 | 4 | |a Buddhist bioethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Catholic bioethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Palliative sedation | |
650 | 4 | |a Principle of double effect | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religion and health |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1961 |g 61(2022), 2, Seite 1405-1417 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320578089 |w (DE-600)2017250-3 |w (DE-576)121466191 |x 1573-6571 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:61 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:1405-1417 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01464-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4131496569 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1801304742 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220510142740 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220510||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |