Från antika kättarmunkar till religionsdebatter på Facebook: Några nedslag i heresins form och historia

This article argues that there are observable similarities between the way ancient heresiologists depicted their theological opponents and how religious people and religion as a phenomenon are described by con­­­tempo­rary anti-religion orators. The short study takes its departure from previ­ous stu...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Linjamaa, Paul (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Suédois
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Bloms Boktryckeri 2022
Dans: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Année: 2022, Volume: 98, Numéro: 1, Pages: 35-44
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Hérésie / Critique de la religion / Histoire 0-400 / Histoire 2000-2021
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
KAB Christianisme primitif
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This article argues that there are observable similarities between the way ancient heresiologists depicted their theological opponents and how religious people and religion as a phenomenon are described by con­­­tempo­rary anti-religion orators. The short study takes its departure from previ­ous studies on the Nag Hammadi texts and ancient heresiological discourse and ends with reflections on the parallels to how religion is debated in social media today. It is argued, by way of Zygmunt Bauman andUmberto Eco, that if we wish to understand the underlying mechanisms behind both ancient heresiological and contemporary anti-religious rhetorics, we can gain much by applying theories on the formation of individ­ual and group ide
Contient:Enthalten in: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.51619/stk.v98i1.23936