Från antika kättarmunkar till religionsdebatter på Facebook: Några nedslag i heresins form och historia
This article argues that there are observable similarities between the way ancient heresiologists depicted their theological opponents and how religious people and religion as a phenomenon are described by contemporary anti-religion orators. The short study takes its departure from previous stu...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Suédois |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Bloms Boktryckeri
2022
|
Dans: |
Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Année: 2022, Volume: 98, Numéro: 1, Pages: 35-44 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Hérésie
/ Critique de la religion
/ Histoire 0-400
/ Histoire 2000-2021
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion KAB Christianisme primitif KAJ Époque contemporaine KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This article argues that there are observable similarities between the way ancient heresiologists depicted their theological opponents and how religious people and religion as a phenomenon are described by contemporary anti-religion orators. The short study takes its departure from previous studies on the Nag Hammadi texts and ancient heresiological discourse and ends with reflections on the parallels to how religion is debated in social media today. It is argued, by way of Zygmunt Bauman andUmberto Eco, that if we wish to understand the underlying mechanisms behind both ancient heresiological and contemporary anti-religious rhetorics, we can gain much by applying theories on the formation of individual and group ide |
---|---|
Contient: | Enthalten in: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.51619/stk.v98i1.23936 |