Once more to the hotel
William Lane Craig's defence of the so-called ‘Hilbert's Hotel Argument’ for the beginning of the universe seems to be in conflict with his own presentist views, as I argued in my earlier article ‘Heartbreak at Hilbert's Hotel’ (2014). In response, Andrew Loke (2014) has defended a mo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2020
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: 1, Pages: 18-29 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel
/ Cosmogony
/ Eternity
/ Temporality
/ Infinity
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1804284831 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231127173100.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220524s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S003441252000013X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1804284831 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1804284831 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1079728422 |0 (DE-627)842132708 |0 (DE-576)452925126 |4 aut |a Hedrick, Landon | |
| 109 | |a Hedrick, Landon | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Once more to the hotel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a William Lane Craig's defence of the so-called ‘Hilbert's Hotel Argument’ for the beginning of the universe seems to be in conflict with his own presentist views, as I argued in my earlier article ‘Heartbreak at Hilbert's Hotel’ (2014). In response, Andrew Loke (2014) has defended a modified version of the argument which avoids this problem, and this defence has been endorsed by Craig (2018). After clarifying the dialectic, I argue in this article that Loke's modification is not as straightforwardly successful as he and Craig seem to think, and that it in fact requires a controversial independent assumption - namely, that creation ex nihilo is possible. I show that some of the more obvious ways of supporting this assumption are either unsuccessful or unavailable to the proponent of the Hilbert's Hotel Argument. Moreover, I show that accepting this assumption conflicts with a key premise in the Hilbert's Hotel Argument. Hence, Loke's modified argument has not successfully established that the universe - including time itself - began to exist. | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1311352430 |0 (DE-627)1871324882 |2 gnd |a Hilberts Hotel |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4073736-6 |0 (DE-627)106091654 |0 (DE-576)209191376 |2 gnd |a Kosmogonie |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4153288-0 |0 (DE-627)105532045 |0 (DE-576)209802189 |2 gnd |a Ewigkeit |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4134190-9 |0 (DE-627)105674532 |0 (DE-576)209650206 |2 gnd |a Zeitlichkeit |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4136067-9 |0 (DE-627)105660302 |0 (DE-576)209666056 |2 gnd |a Unendlichkeit |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), 1, Seite 18-29 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:18-29 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441252000013X |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/once-more-to-the-hotel/E159E73A063B41F659F6E3ADBD4E145D |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4139389729 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1804284831 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230807094830 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220524||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmogony,Origin of the world,Eternity,Eternity,Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel,Infinity,Infinity,The Infinite,Temporality |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmogonie,Hôtel de Hilbert,Infini,Infini,Temporalité,Éternité,Éternité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmogonía,Eternidad,Eternidad,Infinito,Infinito,Temporalidad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmogonia,Eternità,Eternità,Infinito,Infinito,Temporalità |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 天体演化论,宇宙起源学说,宇宙进化论,无限,无限,时间性,尘世,永恒,永恒,永久,永世,永久,永世 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 天體演化論,宇宙起源學說,宇宙進化論,時間性,塵世,永恆,永恆,永久,永世,永久,永世,無限,無限 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmogonia,Eternidade,Eternidade,Infinito,Infinito,Temporalidade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бесконечность (мотив),Бесконечность,Бренный мир,Вечность (мотив),Вечность,Космогония |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Άπειρο (μοτίβο),Άπειρο,Αιωνιότητα (μοτίβο),Αιωνιότητα,Κοσμογονία,Χρονικότητα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel,Hilbert's hotel,Hilberts Paradoxon des Grand Hotels,Unendliches Hotelparadoxon,Hotel infinity , Weltall,Weltentstehung,Kosmologie , Das Unendliche |