Mapping the epistemic arguments for religious toleration
In the literature on toleration, epistemic arguments are commonly equated with John Stuart Mill's fallibilism according to which toleration of opinions is a necessary means to the attainment of truth. This conflation does not capture the variety of those arguments and it results from the fact t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2020
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: 1, Pages: 217-235 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Acquiescence
/ Religion
/ Fallibility
/ Epistemic modal logic
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1804284947 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230811091848.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220524s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412520000323 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1804284947 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1804284947 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1258316374 |0 (DE-627)180431174X |4 aut |a Beauchamp, Gilles | |
| 109 | |a Beauchamp, Gilles | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mapping the epistemic arguments for religious toleration |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the literature on toleration, epistemic arguments are commonly equated with John Stuart Mill's fallibilism according to which toleration of opinions is a necessary means to the attainment of truth. This conflation does not capture the variety of those arguments and it results from the fact that a proper analysis of epistemic arguments for religious toleration and a systematic account of their different types are still lacking. The purpose of this article is to provide such an analysis and to argue that those arguments come in four different types, which I name fallibilism, religious belief-forming process, epistemic parity, and differentiated access to religious truth or divine message. I also offer a mapping of those different types of arguments using the standard epistemic notions of justification, truth, and belief coupled with a distinction of focus in the epistemological approach - whether individually or socially focused. | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1161750940 |0 (DE-627)1025203496 |0 (DE-576)506846431 |2 gnd |a Duldung |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4250187-8 |0 (DE-627)104778784 |0 (DE-576)210751975 |2 gnd |a Fallibilismus |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4152538-3 |0 (DE-627)10553756X |0 (DE-576)209796324 |2 gnd |a Epistemische Logik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), 1, Seite 217-235 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:217-235 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000323 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/mapping-the-epistemic-arguments-for-religious-toleration/CE3BDAD47B468302C28C779D294AAA95 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4139389877 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1804284947 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230811091848 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220524||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Acquiescence,Epistemic modal logic,Fallibility,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Faillibilisme,Logique épistémique,Religion,Religions,Religion,Tolérance,Acceptation,Acceptation |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Connivencia,Tolerancia,Tolerancia,Falibilismo,Lógica epistémica,Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Fallibilismo,Logica epistemica,Religione,Religione,Religione,Tolleranza |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,认识逻辑 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Conivência,Tolerância,Tolerância,Falibilismo,Lógica epistêmica,Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религия (мотив),Религия,Терпимость (закон),Фаллибилизм,Эпистемическая логика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ανεκτικότητα,Ανοχή,Επιστημονική λογική,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Σφαλερότητα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Das Dulden,Duldungspflicht , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |