The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow
Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 553-562 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Trinity
/ Constitution (Philosophy)
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
Commentary
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Reference: | Kritik von "The Trinity is still unconstitutional (2020)"
Kritik in "Can the constitution be saved? (2023)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000396 |