Tutuism and the Moral Universe. Comment on Gasser (2021). Animal Suffering, God and Lessons from the Book of Job. Religions 12: 1047

Georg Gasser has recently attempted a new explanation to the problem of animal suffering, i.e., how can a morally perfect, omniscient, and omnipotent God allow the gratuitous suffering of animals? His argument can be interpreted in two ways: (i) creation is amoral and therefore there is no problem o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cordeiro-Rodrigues, Luís (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 3
Further subjects:B African Philosophy of Religion
B Desmond Tutu
B Concepts of God
B Moral Status
B Georg Gasser
B amorality
B Animal Suffering
B Naturalistic Fallacy
B Gratuitous Evil
B The problem of evil
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1804403407
003 DE-627
005 20220620161408.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220525s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13030251  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1804403407 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1804403407 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1117223841  |0 (DE-627)871306220  |0 (DE-576)478827997  |4 aut  |a Cordeiro-Rodrigues, Luís 
109 |a Cordeiro-Rodrigues, Luís  |a Rodrigues, Luís Cordeiro- 
245 1 0 |a Tutuism and the Moral Universe. Comment on Gasser (2021). Animal Suffering, God and Lessons from the Book of Job. Religions 12: 1047 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Georg Gasser has recently attempted a new explanation to the problem of animal suffering, i.e., how can a morally perfect, omniscient, and omnipotent God allow the gratuitous suffering of animals? His argument can be interpreted in two ways: (i) creation is amoral and therefore there is no problem of animal suffering; (ii) God’s morality is beyond us and not responsive to humans. In both cases, the problem of animal suffering is, according to Gasser, explained. Grounded on the thought of Desmond Tutu, I contend, however, that both (i) and (ii) imply that God would be immoral, which is an unacceptable implication for Christians. Therefore, Gasser’s explanation fails to solve the problem of suffering. Further, I uphold that if God exists He is necessarily a moral agent and if one wishes to give up such property, then also needs to give up His omnipotence. On top of this, I challenge the idea that there is a naturalistic fallacy in holding a Tutuist conception of God. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a African Philosophy of Religion 
650 4 |a Desmond Tutu 
650 4 |a Georg Gasser 
650 4 |a amorality 
650 4 |a Animal Suffering 
650 4 |a Concepts of God 
650 4 |a Gratuitous Evil 
650 4 |a Moral Status 
650 4 |a Naturalistic Fallacy 
650 4 |a The problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 3, Artikel-ID 251  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g elocationid:251 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/251/pdf?version=1647483672  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030251  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/251  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4139649941 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1804403407 
LOK |0 005 20220525153927 
LOK |0 008 220525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL