Blasphemy and Judicial Legitimacy in Indonesia

When contentious blasphemy laws are pressed into service in fledgling democracies with illiberal tendencies such as Indonesia, critical questions arise about judicial integrity and the political nature of blasphemy trials. Judicial legitimacy in Indonesia is defined according to international standa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tyson, Adam (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2020
In: Politics and religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 182-205
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1806902273
003 DE-627
005 20230810121751.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220614s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S1755048319000427  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1806902273 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1806902273 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1137840358  |0 (DE-627)895111322  |0 (DE-576)409353590  |4 aut  |a Tyson, Adam 
109 |a Tyson, Adam 
245 1 0 |a Blasphemy and Judicial Legitimacy in Indonesia 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When contentious blasphemy laws are pressed into service in fledgling democracies with illiberal tendencies such as Indonesia, critical questions arise about judicial integrity and the political nature of blasphemy trials. Judicial legitimacy in Indonesia is defined according to international standards and conventions. The focus is on judicial propriety rather than the popularity or majoritarian appeal of court decisions. In May 2017 a watershed moment occurred in Indonesia as the former governor of Jakarta Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (popularly known as Ahok) was found guilty of desecrating religion and sentenced to 2 years in prison. Judgments rendered in politicized blasphemy trials such as these fail to meet standards of impartiality, and when discursive transgressions of a blasphemous nature occur there are deep ambiguities of meaning and intent. This paper contends that the revival of blasphemy as a punishable crime relates to political power calculations and electoral opportunities, and offers an analysis of blasphemy in Indonesia through the quasi-historical lens of a discursive crime premised on the fallacy that religious offence threatens public order. Blasphemy trials are further complicated by the fact that religious authorities and Islamic mass organizations in Indonesia have significant influence over judicial processes. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics and religion  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008  |g 14(2021), 1, Seite 182-205  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)560846134  |w (DE-600)2417736-2  |w (DE-576)29433923X  |x 1755-0491  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:182-205 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000427  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/blasphemy-and-judicial-legitimacy-in-indonesia/B422C528E90DF77D60443FDA4425A20D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4149318638 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1806902273 
LOK |0 005 20220614083542 
LOK |0 008 220614||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL