Backfiring Frames: Abortion Politics, Religion, and Attitude Resistance
Following recent insight into how citizens respond to attempts to correct political and salient misperceptions (Nyhan and Riefler, 2010, Political Behavior 32 (2): 303-330), we also expect that certain characteristics will predispose citizens to react strongly to messaging on highly contentious issu...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2020
|
| In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Pages: 403-430 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1806905744 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230810122006.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220614s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S1755048320000310 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1806905744 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1806905744 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Liebertz, Scott |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Backfiring Frames: Abortion Politics, Religion, and Attitude Resistance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Following recent insight into how citizens respond to attempts to correct political and salient misperceptions (Nyhan and Riefler, 2010, Political Behavior 32 (2): 303-330), we also expect that certain characteristics will predispose citizens to react strongly to messaging on highly contentious issues. Specifically, we expect that respondents will express an opinion that is even stronger in line with their predispositions when exposed to frames that challenge their position. Using an experiment on abortion opinion embedded in the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we find little indication that Pro-Abortion Access and Anti-Abortion Access frames move opinion on abortion in the aggregate, but there is evidence that specific characteristics correlate with a "backfire" effect identified by Nyhan and Riefler (2010, Political Behavior 32 (2): 303-330). In particular, gender, religiosity, and "Born-Again" Christian affiliation are all predictive of responding to either the Anti-Abortion Access or Pro-Abortion Access frame by moving the opposite direction as intended on the feeling thermometer. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Bunch, Jaclyn |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Politics and religion |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008 |g 14(2021), 3, Seite 403-430 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)560846134 |w (DE-600)2417736-2 |w (DE-576)29433923X |x 1755-0491 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2021 |g number:3 |g pages:403-430 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048320000310 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/backfiring-frames-abortion-politics-religion-and-attitude-resistance/291C99EFD8F6C3D641BDE7C8610642C2 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4149325189 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1806905744 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220614091026 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220614||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||