Stepping in/stepping out: a conversation between ideological and social scientific feminist approaches to the Bible

While feminist ideological critics urge us to "step outside" the ideology of patriarchal texts in order to critique it, social scientific criticism insists that unless we first "step into" the socio-symbolic world refracted through the text, our readings will be compromised by th...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:The journal of religion & society
Auteur principal: Keefe, Alice A. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Creighton University 1999
Dans: The journal of religion & society
Sujets non-standardisés:B Patriarchy
B Féministe
B Bible. Old Testament; Criticism
B Interprétation
B Women in the Bible
B Gender
B Human; Religious aspects
B Body
B Criticism (Philosophy)
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:While feminist ideological critics urge us to "step outside" the ideology of patriarchal texts in order to critique it, social scientific criticism insists that unless we first "step into" the socio-symbolic world refracted through the text, our readings will be compromised by the projections of a modern worldview. This paper explores the tension between these two critical approaches through a focus on current ideological readings of biblical "pornoprophetics," that is, prophetic metaphors of promiscuous women who are stripped and raped as punishment for their transgressions. The conclusion that these images are indicative of misogynic attitudes in ancient Israel is challenged for its failure to account sufficiently for the difference between ancient and modern worldviews.
ISSN:1522-5658
Contient:Enthalten in: The journal of religion & society
Persistent identifiers:HDL: 10504/64473